SE367: Introduction to Cognitive Science

Homework 5



Links

Hindi Reading
English Reading

English Reading Analysis

Data for first paragraph is completely corrupt and no inferences could be drawn. Analysis for second paragraph has been done.
Part (a)
There is visible backtracing. However, following words have multiple fixations which are very close.
Para 2 Line 1: Darwin
Para 2 Line 2: odds

Part (b)
Eye-fixations are longer at:
Para 2 Line 2: At word "odds"
Para 2 Line 5: At word "others"

Part (c)
Backtracking at "Darwin" is because, it is not word of daily usage and hence, it required multiple parses to comprehend. Other textual words ("odds" and "others") at positions of backtracking and long fixations are daily common words.
As you read the words one by one, syntactic structure of sentence is built in mind. Maybe, at words, "odds" and "others", it took longer time to build those syntactic structures, maybe be due to unusual complexity of sentence.

Hindi Reading Analysis

Note: There seems to be a problem with the data. Throughout the video, often gaze moves up and down abruptly. It seems as if gaze data has been rotated by some 30 degrees or so counter-clockwise. However, analysis has been done as much as possible.
Part (a)
The backtracking happens at:
Line 2: word के in phrase हिंदी के आख्यान
Line 6: word पहले in phrase कुछ ही दिनों पहले

Part (b)
The eye-fixations are unusually longer at:
Line 2: word परन्तु in phrase परन्तु हिंदी के आख्यान 
Line 5: word आनंद in phrase और आनंद से प्रफुल्लित 
Line 6: word पाया in phrase रुक पाया है ?
Line 7: word हिंदी in phrase लैंडमार्क में हिंदी 

Part (c)
आख्यान : I don't know the meaning of this word. So, I backtracked to recognize the spellings correctly. In general, when we read something, we don't focus on order of letters in word but overall letters present in word. But as I haven't आख्यान word before, so I was trying recognize order of letters as well.
लैंडमार्क, प्रफुल्लित are uncommon words, so it took longer to comprehend them. At "रुक पाया है?", may be I was trying to answer the question in mind, and took more time to internalize the sentence.
--Nehchal Jindal (Y9366)