the jyoti vadhira school for the deaf in bithur has 176 students, with differing degrees of hearing impairment (from moderate to profound). the students are extremely proficient in signing among themselves, but no form of SL is used in instruction. also, they have not learned it from their parents, since none of them come from hearing impaired families. thus, the genesis of the language they use so fluently remains unclear. when young kids arrive, they learn the signs from their predecessors in the school; thus the language is passed down and evolves. is it possible that a form of creolization is ongoing in this group, as has been documented in Nicaraguan Sign Language (Kegl & Iwata, 1989; Kegl, Senghas, & Coppola, 1999; Senghas, 1995; Senghas & Coppola, 2001; Senghas, Coppola, Newport, & Supalla, 1997), where grammatical structures were found to emerge after some years of evolution. however, a few years back, there were 2/3 students whose parents were hearing-impaired; and it is possible that this may have given the language some contact with a larger community. also, they occasionally interact with other hearing-impaired groups, though this is not very common. given this relative isolation, the language signed at the bithur school is possibly a creole, to some degree similar to the well known Nicaraguan Sign Language (e.g. senghas-kita-04). in this project, we would like to study and document (in video) the gross characteristics of the language spoken by these kids, both at the lexical, morphological, and syntactic levels. @article{senghas-kita-04_children-create-core-properties-in-emerging-SL-in-nicaragua, title={Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua}, author={Senghas, A. and Kita, S. and {\\"O}zy{\\"u}rek, A.}, journal={Science}, volume={305}, number={5691}, pages={1779}, year={2004}, abstract = { Focuses on the emergence of two very fundamental aspects of any linguistic system - the discreteness of items in its inventory, and the mechanisms of combination. -- A new sign language has been created by deaf Nicaraguans over the past 25 years, providing an opportunity to observe the inception of universal hallmarks of language. We found that in their initial creation of the language, children analyzed complex events into basic elements and sequenced these elements into hierarchically structured expressions according to principles not observed in gestures accompanying speech in the surrounding language. Successive cohorts of learners extended this procedure, transforming Nicaraguan signing from its early gestural form into a linguistic system. We propose that this early segmentation and recombination reflect mechanisms with which children learn, and thereby perpetuate, language. Thus, children naturally possess learning abilities capable of giving language its fundamental structure. Certain properties of language are so central to the way languages operate, and so widely observed, that Hockett termed them “design features” of language (1). This study asks whether these properties can arise naturally as a product of language-learning mechanisms, even when they are not available in the surrounding language environment. We focus here on two particular properties of language: discreteness and combinatorial patterning. Every language consists of a finite set of recombinable parts. These basic elements are perceived categorically, not continuously, and are organized in a principled, hierarchical fashion. For example, we have discrete sounds that are combined to form words, that are combined to form phrases, and then sentences, and so on. Even those aspects of the world that are experienced as continuous and holistic are represented with language that is discrete and combinatorial. Together, these properties make it possible to generate an infinite number of expressions with a finite system. It is generally agreed that they are universal hallmarks of language, although their origin is the subject of continued controversy (2–7). }} @ oliver sacks : seeing voices @article{supalla2008sign, title={Sign language archeology: Integrating historical linguistics with fieldwork on young sign languages}, author={Supalla, T.}, journal={Sign Languages: spinning and unraveling the past, present and future, Editora Arara Azul. Petr{\'o}polis, Brazil}, pages={574--583}, year={2008} annote = { During [the 40-year history of modern sign language research], sign language genesis and evolution has remained a domain largely outside of our focus of interest. Its neglect can be traced to the belief that evolving sign languages were often “contaminated” by oppressive pedagogical practices which attempted to shape sign language to match the spoken majority language. In addition, lexical items from foreign sign languages were often imported as new schools were established in developing countries. This notion of resulting “impure” sign languages meant that historical linguistic researchers were confronted with the fact that “natural” historical processes were likely obscured or destroyed by linguistic imperialism. However, such a view incorrectly denies the natural nature of language contact in human history worldwide. In the course of at least seven cohort generations of ASL transmission, archaic forms originating at this school have disappeared, with only the oratory texts recorded on film remaining to tell the tale. }} @article{senghas-coppola-01_creating-nicaraguan-SL-spatial-grammar, title={Children creating language: How Nicaraguan Sign Language acquired a spatial grammar}, author={Senghas, A. and Coppola, M.}, journal={Psychological Science}, volume={12}, number={4}, pages={323--328}, year={2001}, annote = { }} @article{pyers-senghas-10_emerging-sign-language-spatial, title={Evidence from an emerging sign language reveals that language supports spatial cognition}, author={Pyers, J.E. and Shusterman, A. and Senghas, A. and Spelke, E.S. and Emmorey, K.}, journal={Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}, volume={107}, number={27}, pages={12116}, year={2010}, }}